Says
an opinion poll is the first of its kind on the factors influencing the
views of doctors on points of controversial medical ethics that doctors
play a significant role in the way of their application for treatment
and their dealings with patients.
For example, 52% of doctors objected to abortion due to failed contraception while 40% said they need others to the approval of parents before an abortion to a girl not attained the legal age.
What's more, that about two thirds of doctors (29%) said they were reluctant to transfer patients to another doctor if they feel scared and called themselves.
He said one of every seven doctors (14%) said they would not advise their patients to follow treatments they consider immoral as a treatment option.
But the assistant professor of medicine at the University of Michigan doctors considered the position of the same controversial moral.
Dr. David Stern says: "No one tries to force the doctors to take action are not satisfied with them, but our power to make us sick in the position of responsibility requires us to disclose all treatment options even if it does not apply."
A team of researchers belonging to the University of Chicago has conducted research and published results in the New England Journal of medicine.
The researchers considered the doctor's office is the basis of unethical practices such as euthanasia and abortion. However, until the time of publication of this research was not one knows a lot on the way doctors think about immoral subjects and their impact on the practice of the profession.
The author of the research assistant professor of Medicine Center McLean of medical ethics at the University of Chicago, Dr. Vary Curlin and colleagues surveyed the opinion of 1.144 doctors with different specialties for their views on issues of abortion or giving patients Almoskin the death drugs to end their lives without feeling or giving girls under the age medicine to prevent pregnancy.
It also asked doctors about their religious beliefs and their impact in their lives.
The researchers reported that 83% of doctors did not oppose the issue of euthanasia did not mind 48% of the doctors performing abortions in case of failure of contraception also did not oppose the 58% of the doctors described the anti-pregnancy drugs to minors without parental consent.
He said 63% said they felt that it may be morally to reflect the doctor to the patient on the bias to the issue of moral certain, but the vast majority of physicians (86%) agreed that even if he objected to the doctor to conduct the process remains unchanged from its duty to list all available treatment options for patients.
Also felt a lot of doctors in the study participants (71%) that it is their duty to refer patients who wish to follow a particular method of treatment to another doctor will not mind in conducting such an operation.
Search also showed differences in age between the doctors, it was clear that doctors supported the policy of the older patient with all frankness options including immoral as doctors were more inclined to the policy of openness of the men including the conversion of the patient to another doctor.
Curlin said: "We're not quite sure, but we expect that women adopt certain points of view on subjects related to sexual and reproductive health, which affect them in particular, it may be that is why the sex difference between the doctors."
Researchers did not Andhi of that religion played a major role in the reaction of the doctors was leaning doctors of religiosity are less likely to detect things ethically controversial for patients from doctors at least religious.
The University of Chicago Bagesoa it is very important that physicians explain their views of patients, at least so that the patient understands the doctor's advice and work based on this understanding.
But Curlin considered that retain important information and not to explain the patient's behavior is totally wrong.
"There is a difference between the doctor says to the patient that there are three treatment options and saying that there are three good choices but there are other option will not I can explain it to you because I do not wish that you use in your treatment. At least then will understand the patient's reason not to disclose the doctor about this particular option" .
Curlin said that at the time the patient will be able to search for another doctor had no objection to the operation immoral.
But the doctor last seen direction of the medical patient to another doctor compulsory part of traditional medical care.
Says Dr. Peter Ebel from the University of Chicago: "I think this is part of the duties of a doctor and that is as provided in regulations, basic medical. May be strange to say (I think that this method is wrong, but data doctor will not mind). I can understand the fact that this thing harmful to the ethics of some people but it is part of their work. "
For example, 52% of doctors objected to abortion due to failed contraception while 40% said they need others to the approval of parents before an abortion to a girl not attained the legal age.
What's more, that about two thirds of doctors (29%) said they were reluctant to transfer patients to another doctor if they feel scared and called themselves.
He said one of every seven doctors (14%) said they would not advise their patients to follow treatments they consider immoral as a treatment option.
But the assistant professor of medicine at the University of Michigan doctors considered the position of the same controversial moral.
Dr. David Stern says: "No one tries to force the doctors to take action are not satisfied with them, but our power to make us sick in the position of responsibility requires us to disclose all treatment options even if it does not apply."
A team of researchers belonging to the University of Chicago has conducted research and published results in the New England Journal of medicine.
The researchers considered the doctor's office is the basis of unethical practices such as euthanasia and abortion. However, until the time of publication of this research was not one knows a lot on the way doctors think about immoral subjects and their impact on the practice of the profession.
The author of the research assistant professor of Medicine Center McLean of medical ethics at the University of Chicago, Dr. Vary Curlin and colleagues surveyed the opinion of 1.144 doctors with different specialties for their views on issues of abortion or giving patients Almoskin the death drugs to end their lives without feeling or giving girls under the age medicine to prevent pregnancy.
It also asked doctors about their religious beliefs and their impact in their lives.
The researchers reported that 83% of doctors did not oppose the issue of euthanasia did not mind 48% of the doctors performing abortions in case of failure of contraception also did not oppose the 58% of the doctors described the anti-pregnancy drugs to minors without parental consent.
He said 63% said they felt that it may be morally to reflect the doctor to the patient on the bias to the issue of moral certain, but the vast majority of physicians (86%) agreed that even if he objected to the doctor to conduct the process remains unchanged from its duty to list all available treatment options for patients.
Also felt a lot of doctors in the study participants (71%) that it is their duty to refer patients who wish to follow a particular method of treatment to another doctor will not mind in conducting such an operation.
Search also showed differences in age between the doctors, it was clear that doctors supported the policy of the older patient with all frankness options including immoral as doctors were more inclined to the policy of openness of the men including the conversion of the patient to another doctor.
Curlin said: "We're not quite sure, but we expect that women adopt certain points of view on subjects related to sexual and reproductive health, which affect them in particular, it may be that is why the sex difference between the doctors."
Researchers did not Andhi of that religion played a major role in the reaction of the doctors was leaning doctors of religiosity are less likely to detect things ethically controversial for patients from doctors at least religious.
The University of Chicago Bagesoa it is very important that physicians explain their views of patients, at least so that the patient understands the doctor's advice and work based on this understanding.
But Curlin considered that retain important information and not to explain the patient's behavior is totally wrong.
"There is a difference between the doctor says to the patient that there are three treatment options and saying that there are three good choices but there are other option will not I can explain it to you because I do not wish that you use in your treatment. At least then will understand the patient's reason not to disclose the doctor about this particular option" .
Curlin said that at the time the patient will be able to search for another doctor had no objection to the operation immoral.
But the doctor last seen direction of the medical patient to another doctor compulsory part of traditional medical care.
Says Dr. Peter Ebel from the University of Chicago: "I think this is part of the duties of a doctor and that is as provided in regulations, basic medical. May be strange to say (I think that this method is wrong, but data doctor will not mind). I can understand the fact that this thing harmful to the ethics of some people but it is part of their work. "
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق